Droplet Based 3d Graphene Structure Synthesis Essay

Our strategy for controlling the GO assembly in the droplet relies on tuning the diffusion rate of the aqueous solution by managing the oil quantity in the silicon wafer during the evaporation step. Figures 2a–c show the 3D rGO assembly as a function of oil quantity and the corresponding enlarged images are displayed in Figures 2d–f. In the process of the thermal treatment, water in the droplets diffused through the oil layer and then evaporated into the air.26 When water diffused upward through the water–oil interface, the GOs moved to the interface and tended to be accumulated. Note that the diffusion rate and accordingly the assembly behavior were significantly influenced by the thickness of the oil layer, although the solubility of water in hexadecane is minimal (5.4 × 10−3 g per 100 g hexadecane). From Figure 2a–c, the oil layer became thicker as shown in the yellow color in Figures 2g–i. Thus, the diffusion rate of an aqueous solution of droplets was slow, as the blue arrow indicates.26, 27 Under 0.13-mm-thick oil layer, the water diffused into the oil phase relatively quickly with huge internal flux in the droplets (Figure 2g, inset).28 Such a vigorous internal flux rendered the GOs well dispersed inside the droplets, whereas the droplets were simultaneously shrunk by the loss of water. During this process, Laplace pressure, which compresses the droplets along the axis perpendicular to the droplet interface, was applied on the droplets. The GOs were gathered and assembled in the center of the droplets, forming a spherical structure (Figures 2d and g). With a 0.27-mm-thick oil layer, the diffusion rate decreased to induce a moderate internal flux that led to the accumulation of GOs at the top of the water–oil interface (Figure 2b). As the bottom of the droplets was blocked by the silicon wafer, the water of the droplets mainly diffused through the top side of the droplet, thereby making the GOs aggregate on the top portion of the droplets to form a curved GO film (Figure 2h, inset).28, 29 At a certain point, the GO films collapsed and compressed because of Laplace pressure, resulting in the twiddle morphology (Figures 2b and e). When a relatively large amount of oil was used (a 0.4-mm-thick oil layer), the water diffusion was much slower and a weak internal flux was induced (Figure 2i, inset). Thus, the GO sheets would be dominantly accumulated at the top interface and produced a thick GO film that was enough to endure the Laplace pressure, forming hollow hemispherical structures (Figures 2c and f). However, when the oil layer increased to 0.53 mm, the diffusion rate was so slow that the droplets burst before the GOs were assembled, leaving no GO particles on the substrate. These results imply that the oil layer thickness could simply but significantly control the diffusion rate of the aqueous solution of the droplets, so that the GO assembling in the droplets could be manipulated to produce diverse morphologies of 3D rGO. In particular, the anisotropic diffusion of GO drastically changed the structure of rGO from sphere to twiddle sphere to hollow hemisphere. The hydrophobic surface treatment on the silicon wafer allowed the droplets to be lifted from the surface, so that the 3D graphene structure could be recovered intact.

Among the produced 3D rGO, we were particularly interested in the hollow hemisphere because of its distinct shape. First of all, we controlled the size as well as the thickness of the shell. For the size control, the concentration of the GO in the droplets was adjusted at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg ml−1. Whereas the hollow hemispherical structure was retained, the diameter and shell thickness of the hemisphere gradually increased in proportion to the GO concentration (Figures 3a–d). However, the low concentration at 0.1 mg ml−1 produced a squashed lump (Supplementary Figure S1a). It seems that such a low concentration of GO initially generated a thin film that was then completely compressed by Laplace pressure. Thus, at least a sufficient amount of GO is necessary to endure the Laplace pressure to maintain the hollow hemispherical shape. On the other hand, if a high concentration of 6 mg ml−1 was used, the GO-filled hemisphere was synthesized (Supplementary Figure S1b). In that case, the GOs would be continuously accumulated inside the top film during the water diffusion. These results suggest that an optimal range of the GO concentration was required to produce the hollow hemispherical rGO.

In addition to the size control, we could also tune the shell thickness. As the GO was abundant in the negative oxygenous functional groups, we adjusted the pH of the droplets to manipulate the degree of GO aggregation. At low pH, the GOs tend to be aggregated, whereas they are well dispersed at high pH.30 It was reported that the GO sheets were dominantly arranged with an edge-to-edge connection at low pH, whereas the face-to-face overlap was preferred at high pH.19, 20, 31 Considering such a pH-dependent GO assembly behavior, we controlled the pH in the droplets to tune the thickness of the hollow hemispherical structure (Figures 3e–h). Acidic conditions (pH 1) led to strong attraction among the GO sheets with wrinkled edges, resulting in a lump with rough surface. However, as the pH value increased from 4 to 10, the repulsion between the GO sheets became significant and assembled in a layer-by-layer manner, so the shell thickness was gradually thinner. The thickness of the hollow hemisphere was reduced to 2.63±0.09, 2.0±0.10 and 1.39±0.04 μm at pH 4, 7 and 10, respectively. These results imply that we could adjust the size and the thickness of the hollow hemisphere by controlling the GO concentration and pH inside the micro-droplet.

We further investigated the fabrication of the 3D rGO nanocomposites with silica beads. For this purpose, we utilized the convective microscale flow inside the droplets to embed silica beads in the rGO architecture. Under the synthetic conditions for spherical shapes, silica beads with different sizes (diameter of 1.0, 0.5 and 0.15 μm with concentration of 1 g l−1) were added, producing a distinct internal distribution of the silica beads in the GO matrix depending on the size of the silica beads (Figures 4a–f). The use of the 1.0 μm silica beads resulted in the Janus structure of rGO with silica beads (Figures 4a and d). In the case of 0.5 μm silica beads, the bead density became less from right to left in the rGO sphere (Figures 4b and e), whereas the 0.15 μm silica beads were uniformly distributed inside the rGO sphere (Figures 4c and f). It seems that the flux inside the micro-droplets, which sufficiently induced the GO assembly to the sphere structure, was not enough to transport microscale silica beads such as the nanosized GOs. Such a size-dependent distribution of the silica beads in the droplets can be explained by a modified sedimentation equilibrium that describes vertical density gradient of a Brownian particle32 (Supplementary Information S2),

where n0 and n are the density of particles at height h=0 and h, r is the radius of particles, g is gravitational acceleration and ρ and ρ′ are the density of the beads and the fluid. k and T are the Boltzmann constant and temperature, η and υ are viscosity and flow velocity, respectively. The ratio of n0/n is proportional to the radius of the particle. Thus, if the size of the silica beads was larger, the number of the beads at the bottom of the droplets would increase. In the opposite case, the smaller beads would be equally distributed along the height in the droplets. Figure 4g displays the schematics of the silica bead distribution depending on size. In the case of 1.0 μm silica beads, the gravitational force would be greater than the dispersive force that is the combination of the internal flux force with the buoyance force, and hence the silica beads sunk. In the case of 0.5 μm silica beads, the dispersive force is more dominant owing to the reduced weight of beads, forming a density gradient in the internal structure. When 0.15 μm sized beads are used, a relatively large dispersive force is exerted, distributing the beads uniformly inside the rGO microparticles. The results clearly show that the distribution of the silica beads in the rGO sphere could be controlled by their size, whereas the nano-sized GO sheets were aggregated as microparticles because of the high internal flux as described in Figure 2g.

Such a tendency was also found in the hollow hemispherical structure. As shown in the schematics of Figure 5a, the silica beads of 1.0 μm would settle down at the bottom of the droplets and are much more slowly transported upward than the GO sheets, and hence the beads would be embedded inside the concaved rGO. The scanning electron microscopy images of Figure 5b confirm that the beads were located only inside the shell. As the bead concentration increased from 0.5 to 2 g l−1, the silica beads in the concave surface were more densely packed. The use of the 0.5 μm silica beads would result in a bead gradient in the rGO shell because of the convective internal flux that carried some of the beads upward (Figure 5a, the middle panel). We could observe more beads inside the shell than those outside the shell, and the cross-sectional image displayed more densely packed beads in the inner part of the shell, whereas the convex side was mainly covered by rGO (Figure 5c). Finally, in case of the 0.15 μm silica beads, the movement of the GO and the bead toward the top of the droplets is comparable, and hence the beads would be uniformly distributed in the hollow hemispherical rGO (Figure 5a, the bottom panel). Figure 5d clearly shows the uniform distribution of the 0.15 μm beads within the hollow hemispherical rGO shell. The variation of bead concentration rarely influenced the bead distribution, but the curvature of the hollow hemispherical rGO was reduced as the bead concentration increased.

As-synthesized rGO-SiO2 composites can be further modified by dissolving silica beads in hydrofluoric acid, producing porous structure. As the bead size and distribution can be controlled as described above, the complicated 3D rGO with tunable pore sizes and spatial distributions could be achieved. As a model, spherical and hollow hemispherical rGO-SiO2 composites, which were synthesized with 0.15 μm diameter silica beads and 2.6 g l−1 concentration, were chosen and the wet etching process was performed to remove the beads. Figures 6a–h show the scanning electron microscopy images of the porous spherical and porous hollow hemispherical rGO structures. As we utilized a high concentration of the silica beads, we could observe the pores throughout the 3D rGO. Such a porous graphene material has significant potential to be used in the fields of energy storage, catalysis, CO2 capture, adsorption and separation.5, 13, 33, 34

Recent reports presented the unique surface plasmonic properties of graphene, and graphene is regarded as the ideal material for the next-generation photonic device.35 Because the plasmonic phenomenon of graphene depends on the thickness as well as the shape, we are particularly interested in the optical plasmonic properties of the 3D porous hollow hemispherical graphene structure and investigated its plasmonic effect spatially and spectrally by using a monochromated EELS in an aberration-corrected STEM. Experimental details are described in the Supplementary Information S3. We targeted the vacant shell for the EELS mapping (Figures 7b–e), and the EELS spectrum shows a π plasmon peak at 5.4 eV and a π+σ plasmon peak at 24 eV that were similar to those of multilayer graphene (>5 layers) because of the stacked rGOs (Figure 7a)36, 37. Theoretical calculation for graphene plasmon and its correlation with the sample thickness have revealed that π plasmon at 4.5 eV and π+σ plasmon at 15 eV are characteristic of the surface plasmon, whereas π+σ plasmon at 25 eV is indicative of the bulk plasmon.36, 37, 38

Herein, we utilized the EELS mapping with an energy loss response at 5.4, 15 and 24 eV to comprehensively understand the plasmonic properties of the vacant graphene ball (Supplementary Figure S2b, red box). The targeted 3D graphene structure allowed us to obtain the EELS imaging on both the thin thickness at the center (the inner part of Figure 7b) and the thick thickness at the edge (the close boundary of the yellow line in Figure 7b) (see the schematics in Supplementary Figures S2c and d). We also noted the yellow boundary line between the surface and the vacuum to investigate the distance of the aloof excitation that suggests the existence of surface plasmons.39, 40, 41 The EELS imaging using the signal at 5.4 eV shows a high plasmonic intensity at the center, a low intensity at the edge and a long aloof plasmon excitation, confirming that 5.4 eV is a surface plasmon (Figure 7c). At 24 eV of π+σ plasmon, a high plasmonic intensity on the edge was displayed with a short aloof excitation, suggesting that 24 eV is a bulk plasmon (Figure 7d). Although the π+σ plasmon peak at 15 eV was not clear because of the overlap of the broad 24 eV peak in Figure 7a, we produced the EELS image of the low-loss response at 15 eV to check the intensity distribution near the surface (Figure 7e). In this case, a high intensity of plasmon was detected at the edge part (bulk plasmon) and, interestingly, a relatively long aloof excitation distinctly coexisted, meaning the presence of the surface plasmon characteristic. Comparison of the distance and intensity of the aloof excitation is described in the Supplementary Information S4.

In conclusion, we demonstrated a variety of the 3D rGO architectures by controlling the diffusion rate of the aqueous solution in the micro-droplet reactors. The GO assembly pattern was determined by manipulating the degree of the internal flux in the droplets, so the sphere, twiddle and hollow hemisphere rGO could be obtained. In particular, the size and the thickness of the hollow hemisphere rGO were tuned by the concentration of the GO and the pH in the droplets. In addition, their composites with the silica beads could be prepared with controllable internal distribution, and through the wet etching process, the porous 3D rGO was fabricated. Noticeably, the porous hemispherical rGO structure shows the local surface plasmon as well as the bulk plasmon that can be useful in the fields of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, photocatalysis, photothermal converter and energy storage.

Citation data is made available by participants in Crossref's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search inSciFinder.

  • An Approach To Fabricate PDMS Encapsulated All-Solid-State Advanced Asymmetric Supercapacitor Device with Vertically Aligned Hierarchical Zn–Fe–Co Ternary Oxide Nanowire and Nitrogen Doped Graphene Nanosheet for High Power Device Applications

    AnirbanMaitraAmit KumarDasRanadipBeraSumanta KumarKaranSarbaranjanPariaSuman KumarSiBhanu BhusanKhatua

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces20179 (7), 5947-5958

    Abstract | Full Text HTML | PDF | PDF w/ Links

  • Anchoring Sb6O13 Nanocrystals on Graphene Sheets for Enhanced Lithium Storage

    XiaozhongZhouZhengfengZhangXiaohuXuJianYanGuofuMaZiqiangLei

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces20168 (51), 35398-35406

    Abstract | Full Text HTML | PDF | PDF w/ Links

  • Nano-Architecture of nitrogen-doped graphene films synthesized from a solid CN source

    ChiranjeeviMaddiFlorentBourquardVincentBarnierJoséAvilaMaria-CarmenAsensioTeddyTiteChristopheDonnetFlorenceGarrelie

    Scientific Reports20188 (1),

  • Highly sensitive electrochemical DNA sensor based on the use of three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene

    MeiChenHuilanSuLiMaoMingYiGuoJialiTang

    Microchimica Acta2018185 (1),

  • Metal oxide-embedded porous carbon nanoparticles as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries

    XiaomeiWangWenwenWangZhihongZhuChaoYanQingtangZhang

    Ionics201723 (12), 3255-3263

  • Highly hydrophobic and ultralight graphene aerogel as high efficiency oil absorbent material

    YuboChengPeiXuWeiZengChenxiLingShuoZhaoKinLiaoYiminSunAijunZhou

    Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering20175 (2), 1957-1963

  • Graphene oxide foams: the simplest carbon-air prototypes for unique variable dielectrics

    Zhi-LingHouXing-DaLiuWei-LiSongHui-MinFangSongBi

    J. Mater. Chem. C20175 (13), 3397-3407

  • Recent progress in 2D or 3D N-doped graphene synthesis and the characterizations, properties, and modulations of N species

    MengmengFanZhang-QiFengChunlinZhuXiaoChenChuntaoChenJiazhiYangDongpingSun

    Journal of Materials Science201651 (23), 10323-10349

  • Room-temperature fabrication of a three-dimensional reduced-graphene oxide/polypyrrole/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering

    FuxiangSongWeiboJieTingZhangWenLiYanjiaoJiangLiuWanWenjuanLiu

  • 0 thoughts on “Droplet Based 3d Graphene Structure Synthesis Essay”

      -->

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *