Camp, Robert C. 1989. Benchmarking, The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. Portland, Ore.: ASQC Quality Press.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1995. Construction Industry Institute Data Report. Austin, Tex.: Construction Industry Institute.
CII. 2002. Member Company Survey. Austin, Tex.: Construction Industry Institute.
CII. 2004. Presentation to the Construction Industry Institute Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, July 2004. Austin, Tex.: Construction Industry Institute.
Drucker, Peter F. 1995. Managing in a Time of Great Change. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Putnam, Inc.
Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
McCabe, Steven. 2001. Benchmarking in Construction. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Science, Ltd.
Mikel, Harry, and Richard Schroeder. 1996. SIX SIGMA: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations. New York, N.Y.: Currency/Doubleday.
Poister, Theodore H. 2003. Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
Watson, Gregory H. 1992. The Benchmarking Workbook: Adapting Best Practices for Performance Improvement. Portland, Ore.: Productivity Press.
1.0. Benchmarking in TQM With Examples Introduction:
Benchmarking is referred to as the process by which an organization measures their products, services, and practices against its most difficult competitors, or those organizations recognized as leaders in the same industry. Managers of various organizations use this tool to determine whether their organization is providing their specific functions and activities and the need for improvement in their business processes. The organization in which will be benchmarked is Sports Direct, a British retailing organization in the business of sports-goods retailing operation. The organization that will be benchmarked against is Amazon. Amazon is the world’s largest retailer online and a prominent provider of cloud services. In order to successfully carry out the benchmarking process, it is important to employ the Six Sigma Benchmarking. Six Sigma Benchmarking is a very practical and cost-effective method of introducing the best practices to an organization. The goal is to identify business processes which whenever they are put into implementation, it will help the organization attain exceptional levels of performance. This paper aims to demonstrate the benchmarking process of the customer support provided by Sports Direct against Amazon’s, and how Six Sigma can also be used to achieve best performances.
2.0. Sports Direct International PLC
Sports Direct International PLC has been a renown British retailing organization established since 1982 by Mike Ashley. The present state of the company is an encouraging one, as it has been listed as the United Kingdom’s largest sports-goods retailer. The company operates about 670 stores worldwide. The company is in charge of a large number of sporting brands and businesses predominantly under the brand of SportsDirect.com. Additionally, the company owns other retailers, including Lillywhites and USC. Sports Direct also operates under low margins. (“Sports Direct History”)
The major area that needs to be improved is the area of customer service and supports. According to The Telegraph, Sports Direct ranks 77 in the list of the top best companies to provide great customer service which is a very low rank in the industry. In order to achieve a perfect customer support or services, Sports Direct needs to ensure that they continually provide the best service, ensuring the products they offer for sale to customers meet or exceed their expectations, thereby giving them premium satisfaction. Also, Sports Direct has to develop some customer satisfaction strategies such as a constant money back guarantee, best return policy or change of items purchased, and improvement of employee skills. According to Trust Pilot (2016) reviews, the majority of complaints given from customers are based on bad return policy and employee attention. Therefore, these are issues to be considered.
2.1. Amazon Inc
Amazon is an American e-commerce and cloud computing organization, established in Seattle, Washington DC, its headquarters. Amazon has consistently maintained its high reputation as the largest Internet-based retailer in the world based on its total sales and market capitalization. (Jopson, 2011) In offering goods for sales, Amazon takes its customer services as a top priority. Amazon believes in establishing and maintaining long-term relationships with its customers in order to encourage repeat visits and buying, and even earning customer referrals. Additionally, the Company constantly seeks to achieve steady communication with its customers and also earn great feedback from them in order to continually improve their stores and services.
In order to achieve what they do, Amazon offers a number of e-mail addresses to ensure customers can request for information that bothers them, and also to encourage suggestions and feedbacks. In addition to this, Amazon provides customers with telephone services, therefore, users or customers can access the customer service representatives through the telephone 24 hours a day, and 7 days a week. Moreover, to ensure the quality of services provided by the customer service is prompt and professional enough to meet customer demands, Amazon has automated some specific tools utilized by its customer support staff and also constantly planning for future enhancements. (“Amazon Reports”)
3.0. The Benchmarking Level of Sports Direct International PLC
Benchmarking is a systematic process that identifies how much a company like Sports Direct quest for perfection. An analysis is shown below:
3.1. The Strength
Sports Direct recognizes the importance of benchmarking, and then takes it, based on the Company’s shares which fell towards the end of last year through till March 2016. To analyze the difficulty they fell into, they had to benchmark three key competitions in the same retail industry in the United Kingdom, and these include JD sports, MandMDirect, and Decathlon. They were able to achieve each of their benchmarking process using various systematic tools such as Visibility Index, Google Trends, Keyword Volumes, Index Pages, and Takeaways. (Jarvis, 2016) Therefore, benchmarking for this organization is possible.
3.2. The Weaknesses
In all their strategies to improve customer services, they have not considered benchmarking their customer services. Studies have shown that Sports Direct continuously works to improve their customer support and services at all levels within the group, but there is a need for more emphasis on benchmarking this process.
3.3. Factors that Impact the Use of Benchmarking
Discovering the position in the best performance being achieved is important for every organization. This is in fact a factor that impacts the use of benchmarking. According to Zailani et al., (2008) implementing or using benchmarking is as a result of the need to consider where an organization is, how good they have to be, and what is needed to be done to get to where they choose to be. Other factors include the need to share the establishment and proven best practices by an organization as well as identifying and analyzing world-class performance. In addition, utilizing tested and proven practices, convincing skeptics of those that have seen benchmarking processes working, and overcoming related inertia and complacency as well as developing a sense of urgency are what are revealed as factors that accelerates change and restructuring in the use of benchmarking. (Kelessidis, 2000) Moreover, the need to think “outside the box” for ideas for the improvement of an organization requires looking out or sourcing for information outside of the company in order to improve the company. And since the owners of all the processes in an organization are involved, implementation or the use of benchmarking is possible. (Kelessidis, 2000)
3.4. Limitations to the Use of Benchmarking
When using benchmarking to analyze the performance of an organization, it has been established that benchmarking has its own virtues. The limitations that could be experienced by an organization are the comparison of the production time or the cost of a particular process to that of the competitor companies. When they consider the time or process required for their level of efficiency, they may find it difficult to carry out the process of benchmarking. Additionally, when benchmarking, it is important not to ignore the differentiated output that the shared services or internal support group provide, otherwise, the numeric comparisons or straight-across cost spelt out will be meaningless. Therefore, when benchmarking, companies should take into consideration more of commoditized processes or services. (Kaplan, 2006)
Successful organizations have been able to figure out the secret behind their success owing to customer satisfaction. It is important that an environment which supports a quality culture is created and it requires a systematic and structural process. Basically, Total Quality Management (TQM) is a management technique to long-term success via customer satisfaction. Amongst the principles of TQM, focusing on customer is a major principle that guarantees quality improvement. It is only customers that determine the level of quality an organization attains. So whether foster quality improvement, the training of employees, and integrating quality into the process management are considered, only the customers can determine whether the organization’s efforts were worthwhile.
Additionally, since customer service is within management control, there is more emphasis on the role of customers or clients in TQM. This emphasis, according to Charintimath (2003), requires the use of TQM tools to measure and effectively put a solution to customer satisfaction within the management to avert the organization from losing its customers or clients. (Al-Ibrahim, 2014) Fundamentally, the premise of TQM theories is based on the fact that if the needs and wants of customers are kept in focus, controlling customer satisfaction is attainable. (Al-Ibrahim, 2014)
Furthermore, achieving the analysis of TQM philosophy for organizational change, it is necessary to consider the fact that Edward Deming discovered his 14 Points of Quality Management. These ideas have been modified over the years and it was done for the sake of improving the quality of service for customers for their satisfaction. According to Anderson et al., (1994), organizations employ the 14 Points of Quality for management to be able to regularly and continuously determine the objectives their organization should achieve and the strategies put in place for them to achieve these ideas. Moreover, organizations have implemented newer ways, approaches, and strategies to ensure that the implementation of quality products and services is achieved. These strategies have been enlisted from various authors. According to Joseph M. Juran, an important contributor to the development of TQM, the quality trilogy was introduced, these include quality control, quality planning, and quality management. Others include Crosby’s step to improving quality, Kaoru Ishikawa’s contributions to TQM philosophy, and many others. Therefore, to assist “Sports Direct International Limited” on the improvement of their customer care a new tool has to be used. Hence, the Six Sigma tools.
4.1. The Six Sigma Tools
Six Sigma is a simple measure or evaluation of the quality that tries to near perfection. In a simpler term it defines, measures, analyze, improve, and control. It is dependent on disciplined, and data-driven approach as well as the methodology for getting rid of any defects that is driving close to the six standard deviations relating to the mean and the closest specification limit in any kind of process, ranging from products to services sand manufacturing to transactional. The process of Six Sigma is targeted at the customer. Based on some key elements of quality, such as the customer, process, and employee, Six Sigma seeks to delight customers with defined quality products and services (customer supports and services, included). Customers expect reliability, performance, competitive prices, clear and correct transaction processing, on-time delivery, service, and more. In the event all these tries to fail, there is need for the involvement of a readily available customer support service to take every step to ensure the customer is made to realize the reasons for the pending problem, and the next available solution. The process of Six Sigma also requires the sight of a business from the customers’ perspective, and not the organization’s. The delivery of service or products should be looked from the outside-in. And lastly, since people are the developers of results, involving employees is very necessary to an organization quality approach. It is also necessary that organizations are trained in the techniques, statistical tools, and strategies of Six Sigma to ensure the continuous performance of great services. (General Electric, 1999)
Six Sigma offers some benefits. Basically, Six Sigma depends wholly on statistical and scientific techniques to ensure there is a dramatic reduction in the outlined defect rates of customers. (Linderman et al, 2003, Fursule et al., 2012) Using explicit, difficult goals in any kind of Six Sigma projects have the capacity to enhance the magnitude of improvements, reduction of performance irregularity of the projects, and the enhancement of the efforts of employees’ improvement as well as the quality commitment. (Linderman et al., 2003, p. 194; Fursule et al., 2012) Additionally, Six Sigma supplements for the barriers of Benchmarking through helping quality control based on the fact that Six Sigma is customer driven. Six Sigma is so strong that any defect to a product or service processes that is not acceptable to the end customer is considered a defect and wouldn’t be allowed in the organization for the improvement of quality. This is because Six Sigma takes into consideration the processes involved in the production of a product as well as the finishing of a service, not just its final outcome. And since the major problem Sports Direct is facing is its customer support process, employing Six Sigma will help the organization promote and improve its return policy and also the approach in which customers answer customers.
Some limitations to Six Sigma are based on the metric associated with the tool. According to Fursule et al., 2012, Six Sigma is targeted at metric, which hence, directly impacts the design and process management of products/services. In addition, top management involvement is crucial to Six Sigma implementation. This is because they have the final decision to make in providing the required resources to increase customer satisfaction. (Lee & Choi, 2006)
Achieving a successful customer satisfaction is based on Total Quality Management in any organization. Benchmarking is an active process in this regard. It defines the comparison of a default in an organization to its thriving competitors’ process. Statistics have shown that Sports Direct has a poor customer service; however, Sports Direct keeps trying to ensure these issues are averted. Employing the Six Sigma tool will help take the problem from the top management to the least employee in making sure the company’s strategic goals are fully evaluated. However, this will be done to an extent, but in order to keep the entire organisation running at a high standard Sports direct need to implore a continuous improvement strategy which is attainable by employing Total quality system. An excellent example of this would be Toyota who don’t just use a singular tool but rather a variety of tools based around their Total quality system. Toyota use Jidoka which is essentially automation with a human touch, This will define the gap between the set goals to achieve a better customer service and the current performance in the organization.
Another concept which is implored is Just in time, which prevents wastage. It follows a concept based on everything manufactured will be used, thus, saving the organisation a huge sum of money and increases customer satisfaction. If Sports Direct is determined to achieve complete organisational efficiency, a TQM system is a concrete recommendation as it is evidential in the case of Toyota and also Amazon where they have also incorporated Kaizen amongst other tools for continuous improvement of the organisation. Conclusively, by incorporating a set of tools to create a TQM system will define the gap between the set goals to achieve a better customer service and the current performance in the organization.
Also study: Corporate Growth Strategies Examples
Al-Ibrahim, A. (2014). Quality Management and Its Role in Improving Service Quality in Public Sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences JBMS, 2(6), 123–147. http://doi.org/10.12691/jbms-2-6-1
Amazon Inc. (1999). United States Securities and Exchange Commissioin. Form 10-K, 1–47. Retrieved from http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/97/97664/reports/123198_10k.pdf
Christie, S. (2014). The 100 best and worst companies for customer service. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/11103540/the-100-best-and-worst-companies-for-customer-service.html
General Electric. What is Six Sigma: The Roadmap to Customer Impact. Retrieved from http://www.ge.com/sixsigma/sixsigma.pdf
Fursule, N. V., Bansod, S. V., & Fursule, S. N. (2012). Understanding the Benefits and Limitations of Six Sigma Methodology. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.ijsrp.org/research_paper_jan2012/ijsrp-jan-2012-32.pdf
Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control the Japanese way. Retrieved from http://pubs.sciepub.com/jbms/2/6/1/
Javis, R. (2016). UK Sports Retailers – Search Benchmarking by theMediaFlow. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.themediaflow.com/blog/uk-sports-retailers-search-benchmarking
Kaplan, R. S. (2006, September). When Benchmarks Don’t Work. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/when-benchmarks-dont-work
Keys to Improving Your Team’s Customer Service Skills | SurveyMonkey. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from surveymonkey/mp/6-keys-improving-teams-customer-service-skills/
Lee, & Choi. (2006). Six Sigma: A Vital Improvement Approach when Applied to the Right Problems, in the Right Environment. Assembly Automation, 10–18.
Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Choo, A. S. (2006). Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 193–204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.005
Michael B. Sauter, Thomas C. Frohlich, & St., S. S. 24/7 W. (2015, February). 2015’s Customer Service Hall of Fame. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2015/07/24/24-7-wall-st-customer-service-hall-fame/30599943/
Sports Direct. (2015). Sports Direct Annual Report. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.sportsdirectplc.com/~/media/files/s/sports-direct/annual-report/annual report 2015 – final.pdf
Sports Direct. (2016). Welcome to our Customer Services. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.sportsdirect.com/customerservices/deliveryinfo/deliverytoyourlocalstore
Sportsdirect is rated “Bad” with 1.8 / 10 on Trustpilot. (2016). Retrieved August 3, 2016, from https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.sportsdirect.com
What Is Six Sigma? Retrieved August 3, 2016, from isixsigma/new-to-six- sigma/getting-started/what-six-sigma/
What Is Total Quality Management Principles. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.bexcellence.org/total-quality-management.html